DEATH MAY be the great equalizer, but it's no escape from the debt collector.
The explosion of consumer borrowing — not to mention the skyrocketing cost of health care, which many consumers finance at least partly on high-interest credit cards — means Americans are taking more debt with them when they die.
That has created a fast-growing new niche: debt collectors who specialize in squeezing the estates of the dearly departed or their unwary relatives.
Existing federal law makes collecting those debts difficult. In most cases, for example, it prohibits collectors from calling family and friends of debtors. Unless a debt was incurred by both the deceased and a survivor — in the case of a joint credit card account, for example — relatives usually are under no obligation to make good on the debt from their own funds.
But a newly unveiled draft policy from the Federal Trade Commission could erode those protections. The policy broadens the number of people debt collectors can contact to find out who's in charge of paying off debts incurred by the deceased.
CONSUMER advocates worry that would open the door to more aggressive debt collection practices.
The FTC is inviting public comments on that policy until Dec. 1.
Ironically, the new policy comes as state and federal agencies, including the FTC, have begun cracking down on overly aggressive debt collectors and debt-settlement companies.
At least five national firms focus on collecting debts from the dead. Their business has exploded in recent years, in part because the economic downturn has made it more difficult to collect from the living.
Debt collectors, who often buy unpaid debts for pennies on the dollar, always have been able to file legitimate claims with a probate court. But some collectors are reaching out to relatives of the dead.
Many use tactics developed to persuade grief-stricken relatives to pay debts they have no legal obligation to honor. The elderly are particularly vulnerable. Continued...
Tactics include sympathy cards, offers of grief counseling and scripted appeals.
They also can include appeals based on the "moral obligation" to pay and misleading questions that can lead some grieving family members to conclude they must come up with the money on their own.
CLEARLY, there is a need to honor legitimate claims for debts incurred by the deceased, and states have resolution procedures for that purpose. But there must be adequate consumer protections as well.
It's bad enough when the debtor is alive and able to dispute the charges. But relatives of deceased debtors may have no way to know if the charges are inflated or downright fraudulent.
The FTC should be strengthening protections for the families and friends of deceased debtors. Instead, its new policy would open the door for fresh abuses.
DEATH MAY be the great equalizer, but it's no escape from the debt collector.
The explosion of consumer borrowing — not to mention the skyrocketing cost of health care, which many consumers finance at least partly on high-interest credit cards — means Americans are taking more debt with them when they die.
That has created a fast-growing new niche: debt collectors who specialize in squeezing the estates of the dearly departed or their unwary relatives.
Existing federal law makes collecting those debts difficult. In most cases, for example, it prohibits collectors from calling family and friends of debtors. Unless a debt was incurred by both the deceased and a survivor — in the case of a joint credit card account, for example — relatives usually are under no obligation to make good on the debt from their own funds.
But a newly unveiled draft policy from the Federal Trade Commission could erode those protections.
The policy broadens the number of people debt collectors can contact to find out who's in charge of paying off debts incurred by the deceased.
CONSUMER advocates worry that would open the door to more aggressive debt collection practices. The FTC is inviting public comments on that policy until Dec. 1.
Ironically, the new policy comes as state and federal agencies, including the FTC, have begun cracking down on overly aggressive debt collectors and debt-settlement companies.
At least five national firms focus on collecting debts from the dead. Their business has exploded in recent years, in part because the economic downturn has made it more difficult to collect from the living.
Debt collectors, who often buy unpaid debts for pennies on the dollar, always have been able to file legitimate claims with a probate court. But some collectors are reaching out to relatives of the dead.
Many use tactics developed to persuade grief-stricken relatives to pay debts they have no legal obligation to honor. The elderly are particularly vulnerable.
Tactics include sympathy cards, offers of grief counseling and scripted appeals.
They also can include appeals based on the "moral obligation" to pay and misleading questions that can lead some grieving family members to conclude they must come up with the money on their own.
CLEARLY, there is a need to honor legitimate claims for debts incurred by the deceased, and states have resolution procedures for that purpose. But there must be adequate consumer protections as well.
It's bad enough when the debtor is alive and able to dispute the charges. But relatives of deceased debtors may have no way to know if the charges are inflated or downright fraudulent.
The FTC should be strengthening protections for the families and friends of deceased debtors. Instead, its new policy would open the door for fresh abuses.
FTC Notice Beginning December 1, 2009, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) began enforcing new rules regarding transparency in advertising relations between product endorsers, advertisers, affiliate marketers, product reviewers, bloggers, celebrities, and other marketers, and the general public.
Opinions on this blog/website are our own or others we have designated as contributing authors. No one else is responsible for the content. We have not received any compensation for writing posts, articles, reviews, or other content, and we have no material connection to the brands or products mentioned, except as noted below. We do not accept free products from manufacturers or advertisers or free books from writers and publishers in exchange for a review or an article. All of the product reviews on this blog are influenced solely by the performance of the product itself. We do not receive any kind of monetary compensation for content or reviews including cash or free products.
Affiliate Notice We maintain an affiliate/publisher/republisher relationship with hundreds of companies. This page may contain “affiliate links” to one or more of these companies.
An affiliate link is a special URL to the affiliate merchant which lets him/her know you reached his/her site/sales page through my recommendation, text link, or banner ad.
If you follow an affiliate link from this website and purchase a product or service, or complete a lead form, we hope to be paid a commission from the affiliate or CPA merchant. Affiliate links may be textual or banner or both. This site may contain in-context textual ads or banner ads, such as from Google, or others over which we have no control over the content. We may or may not have an affiliate/business relationship with the companies advertising on those services. If you click on one of these links, we hope to be paid a small sum for sending you to that merchant’s site. Otherwise, we would have no reason to give Google and others space on this website.You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. We cannot control the activities of other advertisers or web sites. Unless otherwise stated, the website guest or visitor should assume that any link to a third-party vendor is a paid link, and that the author or website owner may receive compensation for that link.
Legal Information Is Not Legal Advice This site provides information about the law designed to help users safely cope with their own legal needs. But legal information is not the same as legal advice -- the application of law to an individual's specific circumstances. Although we go to great lengths to make sure our information is accurate and useful, we recommend you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information, and your interpretation of it, is appropriate to your particular situation.
Consumer Credit Counseling Information, Debt Management Plan Information, Debt Settlement Plan information, Credit Counseling, Credit Score, Consumer Credit Counseling Service, CCCS, Bill Consolidation, Credit Repair, and Debt Consolidation is not advice, and we recommend you consult a licensed credit counseling agency, debt settlement attorney, and/or licensed debt management plan administrator in your state if you want professional assurance that our information, and your interpretation of it, is appropriate to your particular situation.
